Surveillance Society and the RFID Menace

While looking into whether or not there are any tires left that do not have RFID tags, I found this little gem. The far-reaching ramifications are astounding and horrifying. Below is just the abstract of the patent application:

USPTO Application #: 20060180647
Title: Rfid applications
Abstract: Applications of RFID technology include: RFID Tags on Automobiles in Parking Garages; RFID w/Toothbrushes; RFID Tags For Laundry Settings; RFID Tags Or Labels to Find a Mate; RFID To Identify The Value Of Coins; RFID Tags In The Doctors Office; RFID Tags Or Labels In Game Arcades; RFID With Prisoners; RFID Tags To Identify Soldiers; RFID Labels As Tags To Label Particular Components Of Aircraft or Other Structures; Car, Snowmobile, Boat, Etc. Ignition That Won't Start Without RFID Card; Car seats with RFID reader and memory; Air bags that adjust based on information on RFID; Car that keeps track of GPS info and knows whos driving based on RFID; RFID Smart Closet; Method of taking attendance; RFID on networked desks to monitor the location of individuals; Personal computer reads RFID to log you in and take you to favorite web page, load favorites list, etc.; RFID labels on Files; RFID address label versions of all label and sheet inventions; RFID sports tickets; Combination function invitation and RFID chip to allow admittance; Roll of tape with RFID built in; Schoolbus reads which kids getting on, keeps record; RFID on each car wheel; RFID key to operate common-area laundry; RFID to automatically adjust weights/treadmill settings in gym; RFID w/clothes measurements, save shelf space at store, get proper size; RFID keyring w/car information; Keep track of who's driving around neighborhood; RFID dental implant; RFID Thumbtack; RFID Doorstop; RFID identification of boats or ships at docks; RFID on cups w/specifics of favorite coffee drinks; RFID on bridges with RFID tanks on top of cars, to detect speeding; RFID on studs in a wall and RFID reader that acts as a stud finder; RFID tags or labels inside tires; RFID cards supplied with newspapers or magazines; RFID card that lights up a when the user reaches a particular location; RFID sports ticket w/automatic map generation to seat; RFID card to tell school cafeteria what lunch to prepare for particular student; student desk with slot to receive RFID card, desks on networks together, Central computing system can tell where any particular student is sitting at any given moment within the school; RFID readers on outdoor play equipment; Authentication of Expensive Items With RFID; Paintings or other art work with RFID label to be used to verify the number in a limited series; RFID on sports helmet or uniform; RFID chips in paint; RFID cards issued to airline passengers to identify type of drinks and meals for a particular passenger, etc.; Greeting Cards With RFID; Decorative Tiles With RFID Tags; RFID in Car Washes; and Adaptive Advertising Based on RFID Information. (end of abstract)
Agent: Scott R. Hansen - Irvine, CA, US
Inventor: Scott Robert Hansen
USPTO Applicaton #: 20060180647 - Class: 235375000 (USPTO)
Related Patent Categories: Registers, Systems Controlled By Data Bearing Records
The Patent Description & Claims data below is from USPTO Patent Application 20060180647.

According to high-level managers and CEOs

Organizers of the EPCglobal conference noted that RFID is already pervasive in some industries, including the automotive industry, where many cars and most tires have RFID chips, said Mike Meranda, president of EPCglobal U.S. The retail and pharmaceutical industries are good fits for RFID as well, he said, because both industries want to keep close tabs on their products moving through the supply chain.

It immediately strikes me that a) there are no tires that are manufactured without RFID, and b) we are surrounded with RFID tags and readers. It's really just a quick jump to install reader devices along exits on the highways (soon to become toll roads) to track our movements. And with our new, spiffy National ID (with accompanying RFID tag installed), we'll be tracked that way, too.

Heck, they plan to keep track of "who's driving around the neighborhood" and even put one in my dental implant!

And, according to the rather sterilized and bland description on About.com,

Currently RFID tags are somewhat expensive - as much as 60 cents each, too much to justify widespread use. That cost is expected to drop dramatically, however - perhaps to fractions of a cent once mass production really takes off. This will allow manufacturers to place tags in everything they make even as it is created. Everything that is made will then be capable of being tracked and monitored.

What this means is that pretty soon, you will walk into a store to buy RFID-tagged chicken with RFID-cash while wearing your RFID-tagged jeans. You will then travel in a car with RFID-tagged tires to a picnic with an RFID-tagged grill and eat potato salad made with RFID-tagged vegetables. The government will know every step of your movement - and so will anyone else with an RFID scanner and an interest in what you do with your day.

Lest you think this is just a paranoid delusion, consider what former Federal Reserve Board member and current vice president and general manager of Texas Instruments’ RFID business Julie England has to say about the "internet of things" in an interview for the Federal Reserve Board of Dallas, Texas :

Q: What future applications do you feel have significant possibilities?

A: Once you identify an item, you want to know more about it. We’re convinced that RFID plus sensors for temperature, pressure, time and even location will be the next big thing in little things. Right now, the most broadly used application involving sensors is measuring pressure in tires.

RFID combined with sensors often requires a tag that’s active or semipassive, which means batteries are present. Those applications are going to be slightly more expensive than a passive tag on a box or pallet. When active, RFID tags can relay in real time the pertinent information to a central database, and the benefit for companies is access to that data.

Another combination we’re seeing is RFID plus biometrics, which involves measurements of the human body. That’s already happening in electronic passports in countries outside the U.S.

We need to think about an Internet of things. Just like we’re all connected with our handy cell phones and BlackBerrys, ultimately we’re going to be able to connect things. That’s got a lot of appeal for significant breakthroughs in how companies do business and how they reduce costs.

A big idea being kicked around in the industry is near-field communications, which combines cell phones with the electronic payment systems the credit card companies are now rolling out. If we put that same chip and antenna in the cell phone, the phone becomes an electronic payment device. It’s already being done in Japan. It’s being discussed in the U.S. and Europe.

Q: What’s the holdup in the U.S.?

A: There are two main barriers to adoption. One is working out the business model between the credit card issuer, the telecom operator and the handset maker. The second is deciding who owns the customer when there’s a service issue on a payment application. Is it the telecom operator who owns the wireless network? Or is it the credit card company?

Um, excuse me... "who OWNS the customer"??? Oh, that's right, she's on the Federal Reserve Board. I forgot, silly me! Masters of the universe and all.
What was I thinking?

Smartcard (video 15 min)

Smartcard is a story about a man who realizes that his perfect automated life is not in his control, but the corporation that created the system. After the discovery, does he have the will left to escape?





Perhaps identity alone will not be the theft of the future, but body parts for the identity?

Creepy, really, really creepy...

Much has been said and written about the Rothschild family, not much of it has been good. They generally try to keep a very low profile, and, owning both the Associated Press and Reuters wire services, it is not very hard for them to stay out of the press. But, if one searches hard enough, the information is out there to be found.

Many of us know already that the 2-party system in the USA is nothing more than a sham; both parties are nothing more than sides of a coin - they both serve the same masters: those who print money out of thin air, and they have all (with the exception of Rep. Ron Paul, R-TX) have sworn fealty to Israel, which is outright treason.

So now it comes out that Presidential candidate John McCain is being feted by none other than Lord Rothschild. Behold:

McCain...Manchurian Candidate à la Rothschild
From Elmer Lane
3-17-8

Under the headline "Lord Rothschild Backs John McCain" The Washington Post(March 15, 2008) informs us that "Sen. John McCain plans at least one campaign event on his week-long congressional trip to Europe and the Middle East: a March 20 fundraiser in London. An invitation sent out by the campaign says the luncheon will be held at Spencer House, St. James's Place, 'by kind permission of Lord Rothschild OM GBE and the Hon Nathaniel Rothschild.' Tickets to the invitation-only event cost $1,000 to $2,300. Attire is listed as "lounge suits. How innocent is that? "The time to buy is when blood is running in the streets." This remark was made by an earlier Nathan Rothschild, the one who reduced the Bank of Englands (sic) gold reserves by 100,000 pounds by cahsing (sic) hundreds of small notes, almost sinking that institution because the bank would not cash his one of his larger notes. You will note that as blood has been running in Wall Street Goldman Sachs has been investing billions in its hedge funds, paying off %16 percent in just one month, "contrarian-like-a-fox" profitably buying up selected assets as share prices tumble. But the Rothschilds are also playing this game with their hedge funds. Are they placing bets which McCain will turn into sure things? Consider what is behind that question: "Nathaniel Philip Rothschild (b. 1971), British investor, co-chairman of Atticus Capital. More than 200 years after Mayer Amschel Rothschild founded the family dynasty that offered discreet counsel and investment wisdom to kings, queens, emperors and industrial titans, his 35-year-old direct descendant, Nathaniel, has emerged as a kingmaker in his own right and an investor who some say may become the richest Rothschild of them all. In five short years, the man in line to be the fifth Baron Rothschild became close to becoming a billionaire through a web of private equity investments in Ukraine, Eastern Europe and most significant, his partnership stake in Atticus Capital, the fast-growing $14 billion hedge fund. Rothschild began his career in 1994 at Lazard Brothers Asset Management in London, before joining Gleacher Partners, the New York-based mergers and acquisitions (M&A) advisory firm founded by Eric Gleacher, former head of M&A at Morgan Stanley and Lehman Brothers. Rothschild is partner and co-chairman of Atticus Capital LLC, an international investment management firm established in 1995, that has offices in New York and London. Mr. Rothschild is also a director of RIT Capital Partners plc, and a director of The Rothschild Foundation. Rothschild is a member of the Belfer Center's International Council at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government and the International Advisory Council of the Brookings Institution. He is also a member of the International Advisory Board of the Barrick Gold Corporation. Mr. Rothschild was nominated as a "Young Global Leader" by the World Economic Forum in 2005. Among the top money makers of the world almost all of the money coming from earnings of his investment in Atticus Capital hedge fund. He is partner and co-chairman of Atticus. In addition to his responsibilities at Atticus, Rothschild is director of RIT Capital Partners, his father's publicly traded U.K. investment trust. He is also director of JNR Ltd. -- the initials stand for Jacob and Nathaniel Rothschild -- a merchant banking boutique that specializes in emerging markets. Like his forebears, Nathaniel Rothschild prefers that his influence remain unseen. Mr. Rothschild is a principal adviser to Oleg Deripaska, one of the richest oligarchs in Russia and the owner of the aluminum giant Rusal, which recently merged with two other companies to create the world's largest aluminum company. Mr. Rothschild received no public credit despite having played a crucial role in getting the deal done. "Lord Jacob Rothschild, OM GBE was born Nathaniel Charles Jacob Rothschild, the fourth Baron Rothschild. The 78 year old merchant banker is President of the Institute for Jewish Policy Research, an organization dedicated to cooperation in research, analysis and policy planning on issues affecting Jewish life worldwide. He is head of the English branch of the Rothschild family and chairman of RIT Capital Partners plc. Lord Rothschild is a member of the board of trustees of the Open Russia Foundation and serves as chairman of Yad Hanadiv, the Rothschild foundation which built and handed over to the State of Israel the buildings for both the Knesset and the Supreme Court. He is also Chairman of Rothschild Investment Trust (now RIT Capital Partners plc), an investment trust listed on the London Stock Exchange. He is a shareholder in Rothschild Continuation Holdings, the Swiss-based holding company for the Rothschild interests which has positions in many of the family businesses, including the bank N M Rothschild & Sons. From his headquarters in St James's Place in London, Jacob Rothschild has cultivated an influential set of clients, business associates and friends who have extended his interests far beyond the normal scope of a banker. He maintains strong personal and business links with Henry Kissinger. His country estate has been a regular venue for visiting heads of state including Bill Clinton. He hosted the European Economic Round Table conference in 2002, attended by such figures as James Wolfensohn, former president of the World Bank, Nicky Oppenheimer, Warren Buffett and Arnold Schwarzenegger. "Forbes magazine poses lower ranking billionaires like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett as the richest men in the World. Retired management consultant Gaylon Ross Sr, author of Who's Who of the Global Elite, has been tipped from a private source that the combined wealth of the Rockefeller family in 1998 was approx (US) $11 trillion and the Rothschilds (U.S.) $100 trillion. A recent article in the London Financial Times indicates why it is impossible to gain an accurate estimate of the wealth of the trillionaire bankers. Discussing the sale of Evelyn Rothschild's stake in Rothschild Continuation Holdings, it states: ...[this] requires agreement on the valuation of privately held assets whose value has never been tested in a public market. Most of these assets are held in a complex network of tax-efficient structures around the World. The power of the Rothschild family was evidenced on 24 Sept 2002 when a helicopter touched down on the lawn of Waddedson Manor, their ancestral home in Buckinghamshire, England. Out of the helicopter strode Warren Buffet, - touted as the second richest man in the World but really a lower ranking player- and Arnold Schwarzenegger (the gropinator), at that time a candidate for the Governorship of California. Also in attendance at this two day meeting of the World's most powerful businessmen and financiers hosted by Jacob Rothschild were James Wolfensohn, president of the World Bank and Nicky Oppenheimer, chairman of De Beers. Arnold went on to secure the governorship of one of the biggest economies on the planet a year later. That he was initiated into the ruling class in the Rothschilds' English country manor suggests that the centre of gravity of the three hundred trillion dollar cartel is in the U.K. and Europe not the U.S. " "United Kingdom banker N M Rothschild & Sons Ltd. is one of the last remaining of the great family-controlled banking dynasties established in the 19th century. Dwarfed by its larger, public rivals, Rothschild nonetheless remains a mythical name in the banking world. N M Rothschild provides banking and treasury financing services, treasury metals, and resource banking, including a central position in the world bullion markets, investment banking services (together with its joint-venture partnership with ABN AMRO), and risk management services. Since the 1990s, N M Rothschild has been taking steps to consolidate the operations of the various and far-flung Rothschild financial operations, most of which operate as subsidiaries under the Rothschild family-controlled Rothschild Continuation Holdings AG, established in Switzerland in the early part of the 20th century to protect the family's ownership of its banking empire. N M Rothschild has also been working in close cooperation with the--independent--Paris branch of Rothschild banking interests, Rothschild & Cie, led by David de Rothschild, who also functions as deputy chairman of N M Rothschild and is the heir-apparent to chairman and long-time leader Evelyn de Rothschild. "N M Rothschild found plenty of work in the great wave of British privatization that swept the country during the late 1980s. The company was involved in a number of the country's most ambitious privatization programs, including the £5.6 billion privatization of British Gas in 1986, the exit of the British government from British Petroleum in 1987, and the privatization of the United Kingdom's water and sewage industry in 1989. At the same time, N M Rothschild, while remaining true to its family-owned and independent status, nonetheless made moves to establish itself as a globally operating entity capable of competing with the financial industry's heavyweights. As such N M Rothschild bolstered its international presence, consolidating its United States operations under the single Rothschild Inc. entity, based in New York, in 1981 and establishing separate Canadian operations with its Rothschild Canada Inc. subsidiary. The firm also opened offices in Germany and Italy at the end of the decade. During the 1990s, N M Rothschild began making stronger moves to draw together the various elements of the Rothschilds' empire. One of the last of these was the highly successful Paris-based banking arm, Rothschild & Cie., which retained its independent status. This business, led by David de Rothschild, had been created in the mid-1980s as France's banking industry shrugged off the ill-fated nationalization of the country's commercial banking system under the Socialist government in the early 1980s. The former Banque de Rothschild had been nationalized in 1982. Two years later, Baron Guy de Rothschild and son David took the compensation they had received--about 80 million--and started a new investment banking firm, Paris-Orleans Finance. It was not until 1986, however, that the French Rothschilds were granted a new banking license and the right to restore the family's name to their bank, as the French banking industry once again became privatized. David de Rothschild quickly took the lead in rebuilding Rothschild & Cie, transforming it into a new French financial powerhouse and one of the driving forces behind many of the country's largest business deals through the next decade. When Evelyn de Rothschild began to look toward consolidating the family's banking interests, he tapped David de Rothschild to become N M Rothschild's deputy chairman in 1992, establishing his younger cousin as his heir apparent. That position was reinforced in 1996, when N M Rothschild engaged in a restructuring of its global operations, reorganizing its businesses around five main product lines: resource banking and treasury operations; investment banking; asset management; development capital; and private banking and trust management services. At the same time the Rothschild operations set up a group investment banking committee charged with coordinating the global financial business of the Rothschild empire. David de Rothschild was named as head of the new committee. Also in that year, N M Rothschild established a joint venture with Dutch bank ABN AMRO to compete for contracts in the world's equity markets. By 1999, that venture--ABN AMRO Rothschild--was completing deals worth more than $125 billion per year. In the late 1990s, N M Rothschild client-intensive approach paid off as the group became an important player in the booming European market for mergers and acquisitions. The firm took part in such important deals as the launch of EADS, the European aerospace group created from the merger of France's Aerospatiale, Spain's CASA, and Germany's DASA. N M Rothschild was also an advisor on the massive restructuring of Deutsche Telekom, valued at more than $15 billion; the firm also backed England's National Grid Group in its $8.9 billion takeover of Niagara Mohawk Holdings in the United States, while playing a supporting role in the takeover of Mannesmann by Vodaphone, worth more than $200 billion. "As the company celebrated more than 200 years of operations at the heart of the world's financial markets, N M Rothschild continued to explore new frontiers. In 1999 the company announced its plans to extend the ABN AMRO Rothschild joint venture to cover the lucrative market for initial public offerings in the United States.

Now, with the current financial collapse of the USD, the manic selling off of US public facilities to foreign interests, the sovereign wealth funds "helping out" here and there, the FED injecting $ billions and billions into the US economy (at interest, of course) which is causing massive inflation and further devaluation of the USD, more and more foreign economies un-pegging their currencies from the USD (on Greenspan's advice, the traitor!), why, oh why, would Lord Rothschild choose to back McCain?

Interesting question, non?

German Reaction to Merkel's Announcement in Israel

To many people the idea that "6 million Jews" did not die in the "holocaust" is unthinkable. It borders on heresy - it is anathema, it is an unspeakable phrase and automatically ejects one from the realm of polite society. But one must understand that reams and reams of objective research has been done on this subject, not by "Jew-hating white-supremacists" but by Jews themselves and well-meaning people others of many nationalities who have a burning curiosity.

What they have found is astonishing, to say the least. Not only is the "6 million" figure incorrect, but many more Christians died than Jews, many others of differing persuasions also died - that do not get their own "Holocaust museums," holidays for remembrance, plethora of movies or chapters in textbooks around the world or the obligatory sympathy and fealty of every nation and hence every elected official of every industrialized nation.

Due to this fact, there is a growing resentment that the "obligatory" fealty of elected leaders and the subsequent "hate crime" laws affecting primarily Jews is causing, not only in Germany but in other countries as well. Sometimes people who research the scientific questions and basis are smeared as "Holocaust deniers" as a way to marginalise them, other times they are simply called "anti-Semitic" as if that would just end their career or eject them from civilisation from that instant on and no one would pay them any further attention. This speaks to the terror that those who perpetrate the Holocaust myth - that it should escape that it should be heard and considered; that it should be investigated and found meritorious and their myth be exposed for the fraud that it is.

Readers are encouraged to do research on their own. This author is NOT, repeat NOT a "hater" of any group of peoples regardless of religion, class or region. But Truth is important and to live a lie is pathetic, especially one that has been so carefully perpetrated so carefully programmed into several generations, so carefully guarded and enforced... that should be a clue that there is much to hide.

Do the research and see what you find on your own.

Germans Enraged By Merkel's Grovelling Goy Show
By Michael James in Germany
3-20-8

As Angela Merkel this week genuflected in an obscene show of gratuitous and fawning grovelling before the bandit state of Israel, a 'nation' born in a sea of blood and built upon the corpses of murdered Palestinians and desecrated centuries-old orange groves, the people of Germany, privately, or after-hours in local cafes and taverns among trusted friends and neighbours, seethed with barely repressed rage. "She said we only exist to enrich them, or words to that effect," a usually reserved and mild-mannered local restaurateur told me as I dropped by for cigarettes. "Why doesn't she just move there? The Israelis can keep her because we don't need her. She's done nothing for us!" The proprietor looked out across the empty tables that, eight years ago, were all fully booked from Monday through to Sunday. Despite an up tick during the World Football Championship year of 2006, she's running at a loss again. She wonders how much longer she can keep her family business going. She wonders why the German government has betrayed her by attacking the middle class. "All they care about is Israel. Nothing's too good for them, especially my taxes." Merkel got a good press this week. Germany's best-selling tabloid gave her the Schindler treatment. She pretty much apologised for being German, for even daring to set foot on such holy, immaculate ground. Just think of the poor Jewish microbes that must have died underfoot as she strolled around Tel Aviv on the last leg of her visit. Six million of them? Prophecy fulfilled? One shudders to think. "The [alleged] holocaust fills us Germans with shame," she told a jubilant Knesset on Tuesday last, onion in hand. Well, I'm sorry to break the news to you, Mrs Merkel, but that's simply not true. It's your capitulation to the dark, Satanic forces of Zionist evil that fills the German people with shame. "The security of Israel is for me as German Chancellor never negotiable," Merkel went on. Unlike the security of the German people who increasingly find themselves living in fear of gangs of marauding immigrants who have taken up Federal Republic passports yet can barely speak one word of the German language, or of the thousands of hardened criminals, burglars and drug mules who have crossed the line from the east unchecked, thanks to the treasonous Schengen Agreement and the recent abolition of proper border controls. "Compassion arises from taking responsibility for the past," she continued. Was she about to mention the demonically violent theft of Palestine by the Stern Gang and Irgun terror squads, the Zionist's 1948 bombing of the King David Hotel, the vicious Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, the Sabra and Shatilla massacres of Palestinian women and children as they lay sleeping in their tents, the illegal and murderous invasion of Lebanon, and the continuing genocide of the Palestinian people who are being starved to death and used as moving skeletal targets by sadistic Israeli soldiers and airmen? Don't hold your breath, folks. "Only if Germany admits to her Nazi [ethnic nationalist] past can the future be humane," she declared without any reference to the apartheid, ethnic nationalist state of Israel. Not even a wry smile, the slightest smirk, or a telling nod and a wink to the Shining Ones in the front row. "Anti-Semitism [criticism of the state of Israel and the perniciously evil ideology of Zionism] must never be tolerated in Germany or in Europe," she went on, adding that 'holocaust denial' [the practice of asking troubling, science-based questions about anomalies in historical reportage] must be punished wherever it's found. Well, you can start with this writer, Mrs Merkel. You know where I am. "Me too," said 74-year-old Alfred as he took a seat next to me in a local tavern that evening. "They died the same way we did at the end of the war: through starvation and disease. In fact, they probably had it better. Millions more of us Germans died of starvation and illness back then." Three million, according to 'After the Reich: A Brutal History of the Allied Occupation' by Giles MacDonogh, an establishment British historian. A German Shoah. A real holocaust. But one about which nothing is ever said in German schools or the media. Alfred is on his second Ebbelwoi, an extremely potent fermented apple brew, and I order another coffee. "Where did they get this 'six million' number from?" he asks. "The Kabbalah," I tell him. "Ask Israeli historian Tom Segev. It's a Kabbalistic, numerological interpretation of Leviticus, chapter 25, verse 10, which you'll find in the Torah." Alfred looks at me askance. "Kabbalism is a form of black magic," I explain. "Voodoo for Jews. Each letter in the Hebrew alphabet corresponds to a certain number, and by simply placing a special mark above any given letter in a sentence, the Rabbi not only changes the entire meaning of the sentence, he consciously performs an act of numerological magic. It's Satanism, of course, for which Jesus condemned them." "Oh, yes, I now that," Alfred sighs. "That's why they killed him. So it's all about black magic then ... this special 'six million' figure?" "Yes," I tell him, wishing it otherwise. "Even where the German government has acknowledged overestimations, they religiously stick to the sacred 'six million' figure. For instance, camp museum officials have downwardly revised the Auschwitz death toll from four million in 1945 to just over one million in 2005. According to Russian archives, the real number of inmates who died there was 73,137 and the gas chamber you see on show today was built in 1948 to back up the Shoah narrative, which stipulates a 'holocaust', meaning a 'burnt offering' as a sacrifice to their conception of God. The German government accepts this privately, as it must, yet they will never admit it publicly. The sacred number cannot be abnegated, for it is upon that Kabbalistic figure that the state of Israel derives its mystical, Judeo-Masonic justification." "So they all know it's a lie, don't they?" Alfred asks rhetorically. "Merkel, Beck, Sarkozy, Bush, your Queen, all of them?" "Yes, because it's their unified ideology, regardless as to their assumed political affiliations. It's the religion of a new world order, partially achieved here in Europe, which is their plan for an Antichrist global government that will take its seat in Jerusalem. If any one of them ever feels tempted to tell the truth, he is pulled back into line, blackmailed, discredited or assassinated." "What about ordinary members of the government?" Alfred queries. "They're not all part of this Satanic elite, are they?" "Not all of them," I answer. "But the information is made available to them in the form of a veiled threat that has the effect of initiating them into the mysticism that enshrouds the issue. Each week, for instance, representatives read a confidential newspaper published especially for them, called 'Das Parlament'. On page 19 of the fifth edition, published on 24 May 1997, the entire holocaust saga was explained as a sacrificial ritual myth. The article is republished regularly. They all know it." "Isn't that treason, knowing the truth and not telling the citizenry?" "Treason against Germany and the German people, yes. Treason against the Federal Republic, which is itself unconstitutional according to a Federal Constitutional Court ruling handed down on 31 July 1973, no. That's why members of the Bundestag keep their mouths shut. In this crazy world in which we live, telling lies will earn you promotion but telling the truth will get you killed and your passing will be written off as an accident or suicide." "Möllemann?" says Alfred, his eyes quickening. "He [Jürgen Möllemann, former government minister and a leader of the Free Democrats] began to rebel. He started telling the truth. They tried to bring false charges against him, but they were proven groundless. They panicked. You see, the Federal Republic, whose authority derives from the holocaust religion, cannot exist without its 'twin', Israel, and Israel cannot exist without its 'twin', the Federal Republic. They are destructively self-reinforcing entities." "So that's why they killed him?" "They have to kill anyone who cannot abide living a lie, because for such people blackmail, character assassination, slander, fines or imprisonment cannot silence them. They will kill me too one day, perhaps quite soon. It's a congenital thing with me, and there's no cure. I've been threatened before, by MI6, several times between 1996 and 2001. But I can't keep myself from telling what I perceive to be the truth, because it is the holocaust deception that is responsible for the chaos of the last century and which is leading us all toward a planned and limited nuclear war aimed to scare the crap out of us, sufficient to our actually demanding a fully dehumanised new world order should the scheduled Second Great Depression not do the trick." "So that's why Merkel wants German soldiers in the Middle East," Alfred tuts as he excuses himself for a moment. "Perhaps they want to add another three million Germans to their tally, just to even things out according to their strange mathematics." The tavern begins to fill up with the usual regulars and I glance at the day's 'Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung', a broadsheet that aims at objectivity but always misses on one particular issue. Charlotte Knobloch, Chairwoman of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, is ecstatic in her approval of Merkel, describing her as "a real friend of Israel". Guido Westerwelle, leader of the Free Democrats, is fulsome in his praise of the Chancellor: "Germany will stand by Israel in the face of all threats, especially those emanating from Iran." "They are not empty words," Merkel had emphasised, meaning Germans are going to die for Israel. It's a done deal. But how many? Three million? Could Alfred have a point? After all, aren't twins supposed to resemble one another? In terms of Israel and its relationship to the Federal Republic, are we dealing with some kind of 'evil twin' syndrome playing itself out on the world stage as an exposition in duality for the entertainment of highly sophisticated psychopaths?" "I'm disgusted with her," says Katharina, a 35-year-old secretary. "She's not my Chancellor. She's a disgrace to Germany." Gerhardt, a paunchy computer boffin, grimaces over his beer. "Forget it, Katharina. We've seen this shit before. If you're not used to it now you never will be." I feign indifference and continue reading. Merkel had left Israel with the usual promises of helping to bring peace to the region: a region that had known nothing but peace up until the violent Zionist invasion sixty years ago (and there's that magic '6' again). For centuries, Torah-observant Sephardic Jews and Palestinians had lived happily together, helping each other out when needed, as good neighbours often do. Then they came, the Ashkenazi Jews, with their forged dollars, their bombs, their assault rifles, their Babylonian Talmud, their Kabbalist Rabbis, their wicked hearts filled with hatred and violence. And so began the Palestinian holocaust. Sixty years of land theft, murder, rape, pillage, psychological trauma, false flag operations and Jewish terrorism. And yet Merkel has the audacity to say: "As we speak here, thousands of people are living in fear of the rockets and terror of Hamas." Hamas, established with Israeli money (American and German taxpayers' money) to act as a competitor to the PLO and a militant agent provocateur committing deeds that would enhance public perception of the unlawful and unscriptural state of Israel, could never hope to compete with the savagery and viciousness of the IDF and a myriad of covert state-financed paramilitary groups. But killing non-Jews (Goyim: 'cattle'), sanctioned and encouraged by the unexpurgated Hebrew-language edition of the Talmud, has always been the favourite pastime of these anti-humans. The proprietor of the tavern has switched on the television for the 'Tagesschau', the eight o'clock round-up of the daily news. Angela Merkel's face hoves into view. "I hate her," says Katharina. "I hate that bitch." There is an audible murmur of consensus throughout the tavern, now quite full. These are country people, but many work in the city or one of the outlying towns away from the foothills. They are average, middle-income Germans. They are hardworking, intelligent, caring, nurturing people. And they are angry. A news report makes reference to the five Israeli Knesset members who had boycotted Merkel's speech, saying that German should never be spoken on Israeli soil, let alone in the Knesset. The camera closes in on them standing against a railing. Their leery faces are lit up by real hatred, demonic hatred: a hatred reserved for all Goyim, but especially Germans. "Why do we tolerate this?" asks someone standing behind me. "Because we're cash cows," comes another voice, "and cash cows get milked all the time. Merkel, the Jews, the bankers, the politicians. They milk us for every cent we've got and it's never enough because in their eyes we're only animals to be abused at will. But somehow we've grown used to it. There's no leaving the farm." "This never-ending holocaust shit stinks," the proprietor says, drawing a small glass of beer. "I'm sick of hearing about it. When will it ever end?" "Never," I reply, "unless the truth be told by everyone with eyes to read and a willingness to defy the traitors in Berlin. How many millions of us can they intimidate or send to jail? For how much longer can they rig elections before the spiel is up?" "You're an Englishman," Alfred says, now back on his seat. "But we Germans don't rebel. We're not French. We don't take to the streets. There'll never be a revolution in Germany." Katharina takes a sharp intake of breath. "It's coming, Alfred. Whether communist, or nationalist, or, I don't know, from another direction. It's coming, and when it happens, things will just explode and Merkel and her gang will be on the first flight out to Israel." "You are the revolution," I tell Katharina. "Every German who has been forced to endure the new system of servitude by which we are all expected to live is the revolution. You've all got to learn to fight for yourselves, for your family and for your nation, and not look to political leaders who will only sell you out once the dust has settled." "I'm with you, Mike," says Gerhardt, his demeanour more serious. "But how?" The tavern is now packed and the debate has taken on a life of its own. As is the tradition in Germany, folks take care not to speak at the same time, each hearing the other fellow out until he has said his piece; each speaking from the heart and from the soul in a way that would stagger those who believe the true national democratic spirit is dead. "Look at us here," I tell Gerhardt and the others as the proprietor switches off the television. "We all know the holocaust is occult bullshit. We all know we're living in a time of lies and hoaxes and propagandistic, warmongering deception. We all confess with our mouths that we are being squeezed every which way by the role- playing parasites in Berlin, Washington, Paris, Tel Aviv and London. But out there, in the streets and in your workplaces you say nothing for fear of the Jews." "Johannes, chapter seven, verse thirteen," says Alfred, a convinced Lutheran. "It's stated repeatedly throughout the New Testament," I add. "Those who wanted to do good things lived in fear of the Jews. It's Easter, right here in the heart of Europe, and yet out there we scurry around with our mouths closed and our heads bowed for fear of the Jews, as if everything that Jesus said and did counts for naught." "So when will it end?" the proprietor asks again. "It will end when you decide it should end," I reply. "It will end when you collectively take back this beautiful country, Germany, from those who have stolen it from you. It will end with a spontaneous outpouring of anger in one huge act of patriotic defiance, or with a series of individual acts of defiance, which will multiply exponentially throughout this land as more and more people take courage from one another. You're not alone and you never will be." I'm tired and it's time for me to go. The proprietor stands me a Cola and the others a schnapps. It's on the house. We raise our glasses. "Prost!" I slowly make my way back home by foot and choose the strangely haunted path that runs along the far side of the forest. I ask myself, "Who are these people among whom I have lived for sixteen years?" They are the same as my people, the English. They are still strong. They know the truth, even though they are afraid to say it beyond the safe confines of the neighbourhood tavern, and, armed with this truth, they have the power to free themselves from the shackles of this evil, mischievous system that seeks only to destroy the natural European and the freely available treasures of life. But in a way, I shall always be a stranger to them, just as I was a stranger in my own country. I reflect upon what Katharina had said. Does it really matter who takes the lead, whether communist or nationalist? Yes, it does, because international socialism is Judaism for the Goyim. The newly re-founded Communist Party, 'Die Linke', are currently running at 14 percent in the opinion polls, virtually replacing nationalist parties as havens of dissent almost overnight. That's no accident. The Pharisees have always controlled rival factions, playing both sides against the middle and then the middle against itself. It's an esoteric art. They've been doing it for centuries: at first by taking control of the financial system, and then, with growing brazenness and self-confidence, the media, the education system, the 'opposing' political factions, the establishment Christian churches and, finally, the government. They have a timetable; they know what's coming, and the communists represent their insurance policy. Having eaten our substance and unleashed a global economic meltdown that will leave them holding most of the gold reserves, handsome portfolios of real estate and any other commoditised asset you care to mention, including our homes and what's left of our publicly owned infrastructure, they must ensure that the game of smoke and mirrors remains in place. They must protect what they have stolen and they shall do so by positioning themselves as our saviours. When the time comes for apportioning blame, it is their puppets who will be pointing fingers and yelling, "J'accuse!" They will give us all a new kind of international communism, one long in the planning and already being fashioned right here in Germany. They'll give it a new name and carefully align it with the eternal Cult of the Holocaust to pacify Judeo-Christians and blend political dogma with false spirituality and the sense of a perpetual, guilt-ridden indebtedness to the Jews and the diabolic Zionist state of Israel. I know all their works. Count the numbers in the occult Star of David by focusing on its geometry. It's the number of a man, and it is the mark of this world: the beast system. Under no circumstances let this mark, the hexagram, guide your thinking or work your hands, even though one day your decision may mean that you lose your job or are in some way denied permission to buy and sell in order to survive. Some of us have already experienced these impositions. Many of you who think you are Christians have already taken the mark upon your head, integrating it into your thinking. If you did so unwittingly then you are safe, but you must move quickly to protect yourself from those who want your soul for keeps: the Zionists and their co-religionists in Judeo-Freemasonry and Judeo- Christianity. If you cannot yet see it clearly yourself, but somehow perceive that you are being artfully manipulated by forces unseen, then you must open your eyes to the truth and learn all you can, while you can. Your survival depends on it. ----------------------------------- Michael James, an Englishman, is a former freelance journalist. He has been resident in Germany since 1992 with additional long-haul stays in East Africa, Poland and Switzerland. ----------------------------------- Recommended reading: Telling the Truth in the Realm of Lies http://gnosticliberationfront.com/telling_the_truth__in_the_realm% 20of%20lies.htm History and Scriptural Origin of the 'Six Million' Number http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Jews- History&ScripturalOriginOfThe6MillionNumber.html One Third of the Holocaust http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/ Kabbalism and 666 http://globalfire.tv/nj/04en/jews/666.htm Jewish History, Jewish Religion ­ by Professor Israel Shahak http://www.abbc.net/historia/shahak/english.htm The Culture of Critique http://www.prometheism.net/library/CultureOfCritique.pdf The First Holocaust http://vho.org/dl/ENG.html The New Testament http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/newtestament.html Not recommended for historical research: The Zionist-run Online Encyclopaedia http://wikipedia.org SOURCE: http://rense.com/general81/goyshow.htm

Masonic Rituals recorded and exposed by a Brother in Turkey

Added: March 19, 2008
Masonic rituals recorded and exposed by a Brother in Turkey.

The first series of footage is a Masonic initiation of three Freemason recruits (Apprentices).

The second is a ritual of 33rd degree Freemason's slitting a sacrificial goat on a pentagram in the Lodge's temple room. Note, you can continue to observe the Masonic swords. The grand master drinks the goat's blood which is sacrificed in the middle of the room and prays in Hebrew language and ends the satanic worship ritual.

The last small segment is of a Masonic wedding at a lodge in Istanbul. There is a masonic wedding ceremony.

TRANSLATION

Please introduce the candidates to us.

Serdar Büyüküstün, his profession is electrical engineering.

Aykut Erensoy, his profession is electrical Engineering

**(NOTE the frequent of white van man occupations)

Kenan Ali Akman, he is a businessman.

Understood. Please bring them inside.

Dear Misters, before all else we would like you to promise to us that, whether you are accepted as a brother or not, after you are taken into what we call 'the room of contemplation', you will not mention anybody what you see and what you hear here, do you promise on your honour?

Mr. Erensoy?

Yes, I promise.

Mr. Büyüküstün?

I promise.

Mr. Akman?

Yes, I promise.

The inquisitor brother, let the candidates sit.

Mr. Büyüküstün, tell us what is the thing which was touched to your chest and which was made you feel with one of your hands?

Uhm... something metal... sword.

The meaning of the sword being touched to your chest is that you keep your promise otherwise you will be made to regret not keeping it and suffer pains for the rest of your life.

Let us avoid any mistakes, are you really the same people who wants to join us? Did you fill in the form without pressure from others and with your own free will and judgment? And you signed it?

Yes.

Let the candidates commence 'the first journey'.

Who are these people? Those who seek the real light.

Misters, repeat the oath we made just now once again after me.

"Before the symbol of the great architect of the universe and in front of the mason brotherhood, what I said was correct and I swear by it with all my sincerity.

I will not disclose any of our masonic secrets and what I have been shown and told here to anybody other than other brothers in a masonic lodge.

I will work towards the end of masonic goals.

I will obey the principles of the free masons' greater lodge.

I will regularly attend the meetings of the lodge which I will became a member of."

The first officer, brother, what do you want for the candidates?

The light of the scientific truth, dear master.

All other brothers who stand by the columns and decorate the true light.

What do you want for the candidates?

The light of the scientific truth, dear master.

Let the scientific truth be given on the 3rd touch of the hammer.

The swords which are pointed at you symbolises the fact that, other masons will defend you should you ever be attacked by others in the rest of your life.

Pentagon: The internet needs to be dealt with as if it were an enemy "weapons system"

By Brent Jessop

Global Research, February 2, 2008

Knowledge Driven Revolution.com - 2007-11-19

Information Operation Roadmap Part 3 The Pentagon's Information Operations Roadmap is blunt about the fact that an internet, with the potential for free speech, is in direct opposition to their goals. The internet needs to be dealt with as if it were an enemy "weapons system". The 2003 Pentagon document entitled the Information Operation Roadmap was released to the public after a Freedom of Information Request by the National Security Archive at George Washington University in 2006. A detailed explanation of the major thrust of this document and the significance of information operations or information warfare was described by me here. Computer Network Attack From the Information Operation Roadmap: "When implemented the recommendations of this report will effectively jumpstart a rapid improvement of CNA [Computer Network Attack] capability." - 7 "Enhanced IO [information operations] capabilities for the warfighter, including: ... A robust offensive suite of capabilities to include full-range electronic and computer network attack..." [emphasis mine] - 7 Would the Pentagon use its computer network attack capabilities on the Internet? Fighting the Net "We Must Fight the Net. DoD [Department of Defense] is building an information-centric force. Networks are increasingly the operational center of gravity, and the Department must be prepared to "fight the net." " [emphasis mine] - 6 "DoD's "Defense in Depth" strategy should operate on the premise that the Department will "fight the net" as it would a weapons system." [emphasis mine] - 13 It should come as no surprise that the Pentagon would aggressively attack the "information highway" in their attempt to achieve dominance in information warfare. Donald Rumsfeld's involvement in the Project for a New American Century sheds more light on the need and desire to control information. PNAC Dominating Cyberspace The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) was founded in 1997 with many members that later became the nucleus of the George W. Bush administration. The list includes: Jeb Bush, Dick Cheney, I. Lewis Libby, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz among many other powerful but less well know names. Their stated purpose was to use a hugely expanded U.S. military to project "American global leadership." In September of 2000, PNAC published a now infamous document entitled Rebuilding America's Defences. This document has a very similar theme as the Pentagon's Information Operations Roadmap which was signed by then Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. From Rebuilding America's Defenses: "It is now commonly understood that information and other new technologies... are creating a dynamic that may threaten America's ability to exercise its dominant military power." [emphasis mine] - 4 "Control of space and cyberspace. Much as control of the high seas - and the protection of international commerce - defined global powers in the past, so will control of the new "international commons" be a key to world power in the future. An America incapable of protecting its interests or that of its allies in space or the "infosphere" will find it difficult to exert global political leadership." [emphasis mine] - 51 "Although it may take several decades for the process of transformation to unfold, in time, the art of warfare on air, land, and sea will be vastly different than it is today, and "combat" likely will take place in new dimensions: in space, "cyber-space," and perhaps the world of microbes." [emphasis mine] - 60 For more on Rebuilding America's Defences read this. Internet 2 Part of the Information Operation Roadmap's plans for the internet are to "ensure the graceful degradation of the network rather than its collapse." (pg 45) This is presented in "defensive" terms, but presumably, it is as exclusively defensive as the Department of Defense. As far as the Pentagon is concerned the internet is not all bad, after all, it was the Department of Defense through DARPA that gave us the internet in the first place. The internet is useful not only as a business tool but also is excellent for monitoring and tracking users, acclimatizing people to a virtual world, and developing detailed psychological profiles of every user, among many other Pentagon positives. But, one problem with the current internet is the potential for the dissemination of ideas and information not consistent with US government themes and messages, commonly known as free speech. Naturally, since the plan was to completely dominate the "infosphere," the internet would have to be adjusted or replaced with an upgraded and even more Pentagon friendly successor. In an article by Paul Joseph Watson of Prison Planet.com, he describes the emergence of Internet 2. "The development of "Internet 2" is also designed to create an online caste system whereby the old Internet hubs would be allowed to break down and die, forcing people to use the new taxable, censored and regulated world wide web. If you're struggling to comprehend exactly what the Internet will look like in five years unless we resist this, just look at China and their latest efforts to completely eliminate dissent and anonymity on the web." Conclusion The next article will examine the Pentagon's use of psychological operations or PSYOP and the final article in this series will examine whether or not there are any limits to using information operations on the American public or foreign audiences. © Copyright Brent Jessop, Knowledge Driven Revolution.com , 2007 The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7980

High Treason And Felonies by Ted Lang

High Treason And Felonies

By Ted Lang
2-3-8

The elephant that has been swept under the carpet to protect the Cheney-Bush regime could not go forever unnoticed by the American people. The unending laundry list of so-called "high crimes and misdemeanors" described in Section 4 of Article II, powers of the President, enumerates such treason that even the Founders and writers of the Constitution, in all likelihood, never had the capacity to either imagine or foresee. Section 4 states: "The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors." And Bush has gone on record as to what he thinks of the Constitution he swore to protect and uphold. As former Bush Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill pointed out, Bush was obsessed with invading Iraq and going after Saddam Hussein. We will probably never learn of the real reason behind his planned vendetta, but it seems that his need to do so can be summarized thus: Who will rid me of this meddlesome competitor? Dick Cheney saw his opportunity to fill Bush's burning need. Never being able to become the "top gun" in the White House, Cheney saw his chance to provide the solution for Bush's burning quest. As David McCullough pointed out in his John Adams [© 2001, Simon & Schuster ­ New York]: "All the frustrations and feelings of stagnation that went with the vice presidency, all that so many others who followed in the office were to bemoan down the years, were felt intensely by the first Vice President." But with the advent of The Establishment's New World Order launched in reality by the Bush-Clinton dynasties, strict adherence to the Constitution was seen as counterproductive to the agenda requiring the abrogation national sovereignty. Vice President Al Gore was given specific solemn duties in terms of "re-inventing government" and strengthening airline security immediately prior to September 11, 2001. And Cheney saw his opportunity to lead and be an effective Vice President. For it was Cheney that started pressuring the Central Intelligence Agency at their Langley, Virginia headquarters on a seemingly regular scheduled basis seeking to induce the needed intelligence thereby providing Bush with the pretext to pull the trigger on Iraq and Saddam. It was in fact Cheney that initiated inquiries regarding "yellowcake" uranium solicitation by Saddam from South Africa. These inquiries from the office of the Vice President must have been very disturbing for high-level CIA supervisors and managers necessitating immediate verification and a thorough investigation. The first level of inquiry would obviously be localized and be an in-house review, but then progress to where a possible direct investigation of the alleged clandestine activities were said to have been taking place. One of the closest readily accessible and knowledgeable operatives was undercover CIA supervisory operative, Valerie Plame. Plame's cover was the use of her maiden name, and her "occupation" as an international energy trader with the CIA corporate front of Brewster Jennings Associates. The CIA had set up this phony front as far back as 1994. Plame would have had first-hand knowledge of WMD solicitations, especially nuclear ones centered in Africa. Most of the information that follows is from the Wikipedia encyclopedia entry under the title of the "Plame Affair." Having established the Brewster Jennings front, Plame was acknowledged by the CIA to have been a secret operative there from January 1, 2000 forward. She operated in this capacity until exposed by The Establishment's Bilderberg-connected Washington Post and its reporter, Robert Novak, on July 14, 2003. Here is the opening excerpt from Novak's article, entitled "Mission to Niger": "The CIA's decision to send retired diplomat Joseph C. Wilson to Africa in February 2002 to investigate possible Iraqi purchases of uranium was made routinely at a low level without Director George Tenet's knowledge. Remarkably, this produced a political firestorm that has not yet subsided." But if Novak is being honest here when referring to a "routinely "and "low level" inquiry, why did he feel it necessary to investigate and approach high-level "senior officials" in the Cheney-Bush regime? Six paragraphs later, he offers this: "Two senior administration officials told me that Wilson's wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report. The CIA says its counterproliferation officials selected Wilson and asked his wife to contact him. 'I will not answer any question about my wife,' Wilson told me. Novak hints at a Plame/Wilson-arranged vacation junket on the taxpayer, playing down the higher level CIA officials' request to Plame and the fact that Wilson offered to pay for the trip himself. Why was it necessary to elevate George Tenet's position by Novak's posturing of the Cheney-initiated inquiry as being routine and low level, yet denigrate former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV's trip to Niger and his report as being less than definitive yet requiring comment from two high-level "senior administration officials" of the Cheney-Bush regime? Consider Novak's second paragraph: "Wilson's report that an Iraqi purchase of uranium yellowcake from Niger was highly unlikely was regarded by the CIA as less than definitive, and it is doubtful Tenet ever saw it. Certainly President Bush did not, before his 2003 State of the Union address, when he attributed reports of attempted Iraqi uranium purchases to the British government. That the British relied on forged documents made Wilson's mission, nearly a year earlier, the basis of furious Democratic accusations of burying intelligence, though the report was forgotten by the time the president spoke." How does Novak know that "certainly President Bush did not" [see the report]? Does Novak's argument seem plausible? It totally disregards and omits the actual source from which the inquiry originated: the office of Vice President Dick Cheney. Why didn't Novak start with the very origin of the Niger question? And Wilson's report was regarded by high-level CIA officials "as less than definitive"? Here's just the opposite view as cited in Wilson's July 6, 2003 editorial piece in The New York Times and taken from the archives of CommonDreams.org: "Given the structure of the consortiums that operated the mines, it would be exceedingly difficult for Niger to transfer uranium to Iraq. Niger's uranium business consists of two mines, Somair and Cominak, which are run by French, Spanish, Japanese, German and Nigerian interests. If the government wanted to remove uranium from a mine, it would have to notify the consortium, which in turn is strictly monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Moreover, because the two mines are closely regulated, quasi-governmental entities, selling uranium would require the approval of the minister of mines, the prime minister and probably the president. In short, there's simply too much oversight over too small an industry for a sale to have transpired." Now isn't this a more plausible observation, and wouldn't it go a long way to ending all doubt as regards the possibility of yellowcake from being secretly shipped to Iraq? Why did Novak choose to ignore this part of Wilson's editorial? And why would the CIA regard Wilson's findings as "less than definitive" given the unlikelihood of the huge and overarching coordinated conspiracy required to pull off a secret transfer of uranium to Iraq? And isn't it possible, that if Tenet wasn't interested, that it might be because such a possibility was so highly implausible and absurd? And who cares what British intelligence might have learned ­ what was our CIA's take on the matter from the getgo? As we all know today, there was intelligence uncovered through Italian media sources, with a somewhat undefined participation in some way by neocon war agitator Michael Ledeen. But Novak takes the neoconspirator approach in ignoring, for the most part, Cheney's role, and plays down Bush's use of those famous 16 words in his January 28, 2003 State of the Union address: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." But much more revealing than those 16 words, is the ENTIRE paragraph documenting Bush's lie, as pointed out by Dennis Hans in his Counterpunch article of July 24, 2004, entitled, "Those 16 Words Still Smell." Here's the entire paragraph taken from Hans citing Bush's January 28, 2003 State of the Union address: "The International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA] confirmed in the 1990s that Saddam Hussein had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, had a design for a nuclear weapon and was working on five different methods of enriching uranium for a bomb. The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production. Saddam Hussein has not credibly explained these activities. He clearly has much to hide." What utter nonsense! What a pack of unadulterated lies! The CIA was clearly on board with Wilson's findings and saw absolutely no threat from Niger. And as to those aluminum tubes, here's Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting's write-up on July 18, 2003, entitled, "Bush Uranium Lie Is Tip of the Iceberg": "Aluminum tubes: In the State of the Union address and elsewhere, the White House has claimed that Iraq was seeking to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes to use in processing uranium, tubes Bush said would be 'suitable for nuclear weapons production.' But a report in the Washington Post (9/19/02) months before Bush's address noted that leading scientists and former weapons inspectors seriously questioned the administration's explanation ­ pointing out that the tubes, which would be difficult to use for uranium production, were more plausibly intended for artillery rockets. The Post also noted charges that the 'Bush administration is trying to quiet dissent among its own analysts over how to interpret the evidence.' Commendably, some reporters, like NBC's Andrea Mitchell (7/14/03), have questioned the aluminum tubes claim in recent reporting about Bush's State of the Union address." Clearly disenchanted with the "obstructionism" of the intelligence community, Cheney, along with the help of then-Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, set up an independent intelligence operation, Office of Special Plans headed up by neoconservative neoconspirator, Zionist Douglas Feith, that would fit cozily into Bush' nebulous description of "our intelligence sources." Robert Novak, if for no other reason than his inborn curiosity tempered by years of balancing it against legal parameters in getting to the bottom of a story, should have known that attacking Wilson by exposing the latter's wife as a "CIA operative" would blow her cover as well as that of Brewster Jennings, then a nine-year-old successful covert operation with a highly significant security mission. Here's a segment from Wikipedia: "According to Murray S. Waas in the American Prospect of February 12, 2004, the CIA source warned Novak several times against the publication: two 'administration officials' spoke to the FBI and challenged Novak's account about not receiving warnings not to publish Plame's name; according to one of the officials, 'At best, he is parsing words .... At worst, he is lying to his readers and the public. Journalists should not lie, I would think.' Novak's critics argue that after decades as a Washington reporter, Novak was well aware of Plame's CIA status due to the wording he used in his column. A search of the LexisNexis database for the terms 'CIA operative' and 'agency operative' showed Novak had accurately used the terms to describe covert CIA employees, every time they appear in his articles." The primary sources of Novak's supposedly new-found information on Plame were Richard Armitage and Karl Rove. It is now established that Armitage, Bush's former Deputy Secretary of State, serving in that capacity from 2001 until 2005, was Novak's primary "inside source." Armitage was second in command at the State Department formerly headed by Secretary of State, Colin Powell. The third ranking official at the State Department under the Cheney-Bush regime was Marc Grossman. Here's the Wikipedia write-up of this Cheney-Bush character: "Ambassador Grossman was U.S. Ambassador to Turkey from 1994 to 1997. In Turkey, he promoted security cooperation, human rights and democracy, and a vibrant U.S.-Turkish economic relationship. Ambassador Grossman had previously served as the U.S. Embassy's Deputy Chief of Mission from 1989 to 1992." It was while at a Washington DC reception held at the residence of the Turkish Ambassador that former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV met Valarie Plame. They later married in 1998, the marriage being his third and her second. The strong ties that Plame had developed with Turkish diplomats and government officials is precisely what made her a valuable US intelligence asset. It has now, once again been revealed recently by fired former FBI linguist and Turkish translator, Sibel Edmonds, that she had uncovered astonishing, incriminating evidence that Turkey, along with Pakistan, was seeking to acquire nuclear military secrets through the United States State Department. Edmonds, along with others, has pointed the finger at Grossman. Grossman was number three at State, while Douglas Feith was number three at Rumsfeld's Pentagon. Contained in the Wikipedia entry under "Douglas Feith," there is this revelation: "Upon leaving the Pentagon, Feith established the Washington, DC law firm of Feith & Zell. His law firm colleague, Marc Zell, was resident in Israel. Three years later, Feith was retained as a lobbyist by the Turkish government. Among other clients, his firm represented defense corporations Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. Lockeed Martin and Northrop Grumman are among the largest defense corporations on the US government's paid contractor list, Lockeed being the largest. And again, with Feith, we see the "Turkish connection." Is this why the FBI required a translator in Sibel Edmonds who was fluent in the Turkish language? In an article that succinctly articulates the situation concerning Sibel Edmonds and her gagging by the Cheney-Bush regime, Gary Leupp, in his January 29, 2008 piece for Counterpunch entitled, "We Can't Afford to Let Them Spill the Beans," offers: "Over 120 Israelis were detained after 9/11, some failing polygraph tests when asked about their involvement in intelligence gathering. But they were not held or charged with any illegal activity but rather deported. As former FBI translator and whistle-blower Sibel Edmonds has revealed, there was a curious failure of the government before 9/11 to act upon intelligence pertaining to an al-Qaeda attack. Most importantly Edmonds, defying the gag order that former Attorney General Ashcroft imposed on her in 2002, is implicating Marc Grossman, formerly the number three man in the State Department, in efforts to provide U.S. nuclear secrets to Pakistan and Israel. She suggests this was done through Turkish contacts and Pakistani contacts, including the former head of Pakistan's ISI who funneled funds to Mohamed Atta!" Leupp continues: "Edmonds claims that during her time at the FBI (September 20, 2001 to March 22, 2002) she discovered that intelligence material had been deliberately allowed to accumulate without translation; that inept translators were retained and promoted; and that evidence for traffic in nuclear materials was ignored. More shockingly, she charges that Grossman arranged for Turkish and Israeli Ph.D. students to acquire security clearances to Los Alamos and other nuclear facilities; and that nuclear secrets they acquired were transmitted to Pakistan and to Abdul Qadeer Khan, the 'father of the Islamic bomb,' who in turn was selling nuclear technology to Libya and other nations." Leupp goes on: "She links Grossman to the former Pakistani military intelligence chief Mahmoud Ahmad, a patron of the Taliban who reportedly arranged for a payment of $100,000 to 9/11 ringleader Atta via Pakistani terrorist Saeed Sheikh before the attacks. She suggests that he warned Pakistani and Turkish contacts against dealings with the Brewster Jennings Corp., the CIA front company that Valerie Plame was involved in as part of an effort to infiltrate a nuclear smuggling ring. All very heady stuff, published this month in the Times of London (and largely ignored by the U.S. media). She does not identify Grossman by name in the Times." Why is this blockbuster of a real conspiracy and proven treason against our nation not being reported by the American corporate mainstream media? We know why: the gatekeeper, with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's full approval, is The New York Times, and as I pointed out in my earlier piece quoting news industry insider, Bernard Goldberg, "If the Times decrees a story important, by definition it is important. And when the Times ignores a story ­ or a book or a social trend or an idea ­ then it is invisible." The deliberate outing of covert CIA operative and a CIA front that had been effective for nine years was orchestrated by Vice President Dick Cheney. All of Novak's sources came from that particular office of the Cheney-Bush operation. This occurred while Plame was probably as close as Sibel Edmonds was to exposing the sale of nuclear secrets by "our" State Department to Turkey, Pakistan and Israel. Turkey and Israel have very tight diplomatic and intelligence ties. Only a few months back, Edmonds revealed that in addition to the Israel lobby, American Israel Public Affairs Committee's direct and egregious involvement in the espionage case involving former Pentagon analyst Larry Franklin that it was only the tip of the iceberg. She offered back then that at least FIVE espionage cases could have been made against Israel and its criminal lobby! How has our Zionist MSM handled this? By the way, Sibel Edmonds is Jewish! So the Zionist New York Times is silent, as are the rest of the media in reverence to the Times' dominating role over news and information in America. Isn't it a lot easier to now see why co-traitor and Democrat Nancy Pelosi wants impeachment off the table? If Cheney is impeached, he could be arrested and tried for violating Title 18, Section 794, Part b, which covers espionage operations during time of war. Such a violation is punishable by either death or life in prison. Outing a covert CIA operative is precisely this kind of counter-espionage activity forbidden by this law, as well as is the selling of nuclear military secrets during a time of war. The State Department transfer of nuclear secrets to Turkey eventually found its way to Iran. Curious how Cheney-Bush are using the same approach as succeeded in igniting the war with Iraq towards Iran; yet, Cheney outed Plame who could have provided POSITIVE evidence that Iran DID at least receive nuclear secrets, albeit, however, from the Cheney-Bush crime machine's State Department! It is now easy to understand why there are no impeachment inquiries on the table; it is now also easy to see why there is in effect a "state's secret" gag order on Edmonds; it is also easy to see why there is a gag order on former Lt. COL. Karen Kwiatkowski of Douglas Feith's old office, and yet another on Valerie Plame. And Democrats Waxman, and Leahy, and Reid, and Pelosi, and Clinton all know the dirty, filthy treasonous secrets of the deadly, criminal Cheney-Bush regime. Virtually every member of this criminal dictatorship is guilty of one felony and/or capital offense or another. How asinine is it for US to attack Iran now, and also in light of the highly publicized negative NIE? And if the Cheney-Bush neoconspiracy is a treasonous operation, what about the complicit Democrats in Congress who are now accessories after the fact? And what of the continuing complicity of The New York Times and the rest of the "American" MSM? Our government, its political parties and our media are all corrupt, filthy cesspools in desperate need of a serious cleaning!

© THEODORE E. LANG 2/03/08 All rights reserved

Ted Lang is a political analyst and freelance writer.

SOURCE: http://www.rense.com/general80/treason.htm